Demographics details for Gotha, FL vs South milwaukee, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gotha, FL vs South milwaukee, WI.

Data Gotha South milwaukee
Population 1,640 20,309
Median Age 28.9 years 41.6 years
Median Income $174,750 $68,801
Married Families 46.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 4% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Gotha vs South milwaukee

  • The population in South milwaukee is higher at 20,309, compared to 1,640 in Gotha.
  • The median age in South milwaukee is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 28.9 years in Gotha.
  • Gotha has a higher median income of $174,750 compared to $68,801 in South milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gotha at 46.0% compared to 40.0% in South milwaukee.
  • The poverty level is higher in South milwaukee at 6%, compared to 4% in Gotha.
  • The unemployment rate in Gotha is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in South milwaukee.

Demographics

Demographics Gotha vs South milwaukee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gotha South milwaukee
Black 26 2
White 40 76
Asian 12 1
Hispanic 11 12
Two or More Races 11 7
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Gotha vs South milwaukee

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gotha at 26% compared to 2% in South milwaukee.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South milwaukee at 76% compared to 40% in Gotha.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gotha at 12% compared to 1% in South milwaukee.
  • South milwaukee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 11% in Gotha.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Gotha at 11% compared to 7% in South milwaukee.
  • In South milwaukee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Gotha.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gotha South milwaukee
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 10.5%
Depression 16.6% 25.2%
Smoking 13.4% 18.2%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 25.7%
Obesity 24.5% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 1.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gotha vs South milwaukee

  • In South milwaukee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Gotha.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South milwaukee at 25.2% versus 16.6% in Gotha.
  • South milwaukee has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 13.4% in Gotha.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South milwaukee at 25.7% compared to 15.6% in Gotha.
  • South milwaukee has higher obesity rates at 35.3% compared to 24.5% in Gotha.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South milwaukee at 15.0% compared to 1.0% in Gotha.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gotha South milwaukee
No Schooling 1.5% (25) 0.8% (153)
High School Diploma 6.2% (102) 24.0% (4,866)
Less than High School 1.5% (25) 11.3% (2,285)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.7% (569) 19.5% (3,959)

Education Levels Comparison: Gotha vs South milwaukee

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gotha have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in South milwaukee.
  • In South milwaukee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 6.2% in Gotha.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South milwaukee at 11.3%, compared to 1.5% in Gotha.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gotha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 19.5% in South milwaukee.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.