Demographics details for Gotha, FL vs Roaring river, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gotha, FL vs Roaring river, NC.
| Data | Gotha | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,640 | 1,000 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $174,750 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 500.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Gotha vs Roaring river
- In Gotha, the population is higher at 1,640, compared to 1,000 in Roaring river.
- The median age in Roaring river is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 28.9 years in Gotha.
- Gotha has a higher median income of $174,750 compared to $60,000 in Roaring river.
- In Roaring river, the percentage of married families is higher at 500.0%, compared to 46.0% in Gotha.
- The poverty level is higher in Roaring river at 12%, compared to 4% in Gotha.
- The unemployment rate in Gotha is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Roaring river.
Demographics
Demographics Gotha vs Roaring river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gotha | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 5 |
| White | 40 | 90 |
| Asian | 12 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gotha vs Roaring river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gotha at 26% compared to 5% in Roaring river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roaring river at 90% compared to 40% in Gotha.
- The Asian population is larger in Gotha at 12% compared to 2% in Roaring river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gotha at 11% compared to 2% in Roaring river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gotha at 11% compared to 1% in Roaring river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gotha and Roaring river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gotha | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 13.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 1.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gotha vs Roaring river
- More residents in Gotha report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gotha at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gotha at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gotha at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gotha at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gotha at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gotha | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 6.2% (102) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.7% (569) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gotha vs Roaring river
- A higher percentage of residents in Gotha have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gotha hold a high school diploma at 6.2% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- More residents in Gotha have less than a high school education at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gotha hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.