Demographics details for Gordon, GA vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gordon, GA vs Spanish fork, UT.
| Data | Gordon | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,954 | 44,102 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,555 | $93,989 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Gordon vs Spanish fork
- In Gordon, the population is higher at 58,954, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
- Residents in Gordon have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $57,555 in Gordon.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Gordon.
- Gordon has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.7% in Gordon.
Demographics
Demographics Gordon vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gordon | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 71 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gordon vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gordon at 4% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 71% in Gordon.
- The Asian population is larger in Gordon at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gordon at 16% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 6% in Gordon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gordon at 2% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gordon | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 7.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 8.3% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gordon vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Gordon report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 23.1% in Gordon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gordon at 20.4% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gordon at 15.7% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gordon at 37.2% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gordon at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gordon | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (918) | 0.4% (175) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (10,497) | 9.1% (4,010) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (16,793) | 5.9% (2,583) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,523) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gordon vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Gordon have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gordon hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Gordon have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.