Demographics details for Gordon, GA vs Lees summit, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gordon, GA vs Lees summit, MO.
| Data | Gordon | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,954 | 103,465 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,555 | $103,447 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Gordon vs Lees summit
- The population in Lees summit is higher at 103,465, compared to 58,954 in Gordon.
- Residents in Gordon have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Lees summit.
- Lees summit has a higher median income of $103,447, compared to $57,555 in Gordon.
- In Lees summit, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Gordon.
- Gordon has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 5% in Lees summit.
- The unemployment rate in Gordon is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.3% in Lees summit.
Demographics
Demographics Gordon vs Lees summit provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gordon | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 9 |
| White | 71 | 78 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gordon vs Lees summit
- In Lees summit, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 4% in Gordon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lees summit at 78% compared to 71% in Gordon.
- In Lees summit, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Gordon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gordon at 16% compared to 5% in Lees summit.
- Both Gordon and Lees summit have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gordon at 2% compared to 0% in Lees summit.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gordon | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gordon vs Lees summit
- More residents in Gordon report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Lees summit.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gordon at 23.1% compared to 21.8% in Lees summit.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gordon at 20.4% compared to 13.1% in Lees summit.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lees summit at 21.7% compared to 15.7% in Gordon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gordon at 37.2% compared to 33.2% in Lees summit.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gordon at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Lees summit.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gordon | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (918) | 0.3% (298) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (10,497) | 11.1% (11,521) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (16,793) | 3.2% (3,308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,523) | 32.3% (33,401) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gordon vs Lees summit
- A higher percentage of residents in Gordon have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Lees summit.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gordon hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 11.1% in Lees summit.
- More residents in Gordon have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 3.2% in Lees summit.
- In Lees summit, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.