Demographics details for Gordon, GA vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gordon, GA vs Fort smith, AR.
| Data | Gordon | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,954 | 89,992 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,555 | $50,799 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Gordon vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 58,954 in Gordon.
- Residents in Gordon have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
- Gordon has a higher median income of $57,555 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gordon at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
- Gordon has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Fort smith.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Gordon and Fort smith at 3.7%.
Demographics
Demographics Gordon vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gordon | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 8 |
| White | 71 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gordon vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 4% in Gordon.
- Gordon has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Gordon.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 16% in Gordon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort smith at 9%, compared to 6% in Gordon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gordon at 2% compared to 1% in Fort smith.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gordon | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gordon vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.0% in Gordon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 23.1% in Gordon.
- Fort smith has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 20.4% in Gordon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gordon at 15.7% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 37.2% in Gordon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Gordon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gordon | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (918) | 2.3% (2,029) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (10,497) | 14.8% (13,356) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (16,793) | 19.8% (17,822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,523) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gordon vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.6% in Gordon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gordon hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- More residents in Gordon have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 19.8% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.