Demographics details for Goose creek, SC vs Lawrence, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Goose creek, SC vs Lawrence, NY.
Data | Goose creek | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Population | 47,618 | 6,745 |
Median Age | 32.0 years | 32.5 years |
Median Income | $84,041 | $169,029 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 2% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Goose creek vs Lawrence
- In Goose creek, the population is higher at 47,618, compared to 6,745 in Lawrence.
- The median age in Lawrence is higher at 32.5 years, compared to 32.0 years in Goose creek.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $169,029, compared to $84,041 in Goose creek.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Goose creek.
- Goose creek has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 2% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.3% in Goose creek.
Demographics
Demographics Goose creek vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Goose creek | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | Data is updating |
White | 63 | 95 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Goose creek vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Goose creek at 20% compared to 0% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawrence at 95% compared to 63% in Goose creek.
- The Asian population is larger in Goose creek at 3% compared to 1% in Lawrence.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Goose creek at 8% compared to 2% in Lawrence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Goose creek at 6% compared to 2% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Goose creek and Lawrence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Goose creek | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 12.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 7.1% |
Depression | 19.2% | 17.3% |
Smoking | 15.8% | 9.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 19.1% |
Obesity | 38.3% | 25.3% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Goose creek vs Lawrence
- More residents in Goose creek report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.6% in Lawrence.
- Depression is more prevalent in Goose creek at 19.2% compared to 17.3% in Lawrence.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Goose creek at 15.8% compared to 9.0% in Lawrence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Goose creek at 19.4% compared to 19.1% in Lawrence.
- Obesity rates are higher in Goose creek at 38.3% compared to 25.3% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Goose creek at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Goose creek | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (235) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (6,002) | 4.2% (283) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (3,266) | 3.7% (252) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (7,733) | 41.9% (2,824) |
Education Levels Comparison: Goose creek vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of residents in Goose creek have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Goose creek hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 4.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Goose creek have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 3.7% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.9% compared to 16.2% in Goose creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.