Demographics details for Goose creek, SC vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Goose creek, SC vs Central city, KY.

Data Goose creek Central city
Population 47,618 5,810
Median Age 32.0 years 33.5 years
Median Income $84,041 $52,184
Married Families 37.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Goose creek vs Central city

  • In Goose creek, the population is higher at 47,618, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
  • The median age in Central city is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 32.0 years in Goose creek.
  • Goose creek has a higher median income of $84,041 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Goose creek.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 10% in Goose creek.
  • The unemployment rate in Goose creek is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.

Demographics

Demographics Goose creek vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Goose creek Central city
Black 20 3
White 63 88
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 2
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Goose creek vs Central city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Goose creek at 20% compared to 3% in Central city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 63% in Goose creek.
  • The Asian population is larger in Goose creek at 3% compared to 0% in Central city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Goose creek at 8% compared to 2% in Central city.
  • Both Goose creek and Central city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Goose creek.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Goose creek Central city
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 15.5%
Depression 19.2% 26.8%
Smoking 15.8% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 14.8%
Obesity 38.3% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Goose creek vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in Goose creek.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 19.2% in Goose creek.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 15.8% in Goose creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Goose creek at 19.4% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 38.3% in Goose creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Goose creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Goose creek Central city
No Schooling 0.5% (235) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 12.6% (6,002) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 6.9% (3,266) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (7,733) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: Goose creek vs Central city

  • In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Goose creek.
  • In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 12.6% in Goose creek.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 6.9% in Goose creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Goose creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.