Demographics details for Goose creek, SC vs Baldwin park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Goose creek, SC vs Baldwin park, CA.

Data Goose creek Baldwin park
Population 47,618 69,455
Median Age 32.0 years 37.1 years
Median Income $84,041 $76,002
Married Families 37.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 6.3

Population Comparison: Goose creek vs Baldwin park

  • The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 47,618 in Goose creek.
  • The median age in Baldwin park is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 32.0 years in Goose creek.
  • Goose creek has a higher median income of $84,041 compared to $76,002 in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Goose creek and Baldwin park at 37.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 10% in Goose creek.
  • Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.3% in Goose creek.

Demographics

Demographics Goose creek vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Goose creek Baldwin park
Black 20 1
White 63 -25
Asian 3 23
Hispanic 8 75
Two or More Races 6 23
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Goose creek vs Baldwin park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Goose creek at 20% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
  • Goose creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 3% in Goose creek.
  • Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 8% in Goose creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 6% in Goose creek.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Goose creek.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Goose creek Baldwin park
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.7%
Depression 19.2% 14.7%
Smoking 15.8% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 14.2%
Obesity 38.3% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Goose creek vs Baldwin park

  • More residents in Goose creek report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Goose creek at 19.2% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Goose creek at 15.8% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Goose creek at 19.4% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Goose creek at 38.3% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Goose creek at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Goose creek Baldwin park
No Schooling 0.5% (235) 5.5% (3,853)
High School Diploma 12.6% (6,002) 18.1% (12,587)
Less than High School 6.9% (3,266) 41.7% (28,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (7,733) 9.8% (6,787)

Education Levels Comparison: Goose creek vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.5% in Goose creek.
  • In Baldwin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 12.6% in Goose creek.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 6.9% in Goose creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Goose creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.