Demographics details for Gooding, ID vs Waverly, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gooding, ID vs Waverly, TN.
| Data | Gooding | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,715 | 4,297 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 46.7 years |
| Median Income | $60,938 | $43,750 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Gooding vs Waverly
- In Gooding, the population is higher at 15,715, compared to 4,297 in Waverly.
- The median age in Waverly is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 38.3 years in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher median income of $60,938 compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gooding at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Waverly.
- The poverty level is higher in Waverly at 12%, compared to 8% in Gooding.
- Waverly has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Gooding.
Demographics
Demographics Gooding vs Waverly provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gooding | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 60 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gooding vs Waverly
- In Waverly, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waverly at 91% compared to 60% in Gooding.
- Both Gooding and Waverly have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gooding at 29% compared to 2% in Waverly.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gooding at 9% compared to 5% in Waverly.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gooding at 2% compared to 0% in Waverly.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gooding | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gooding vs Waverly
- In Waverly, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.4% in Gooding.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waverly at 28.8% versus 22.7% in Gooding.
- Waverly has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 18.0% in Gooding.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Gooding and Waverly at 15.6%.
- Waverly has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 36.9% in Gooding.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waverly at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Gooding.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gooding | Waverly |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (131) | 1.0% (41) |
| High School Diploma | 19.5% (3,066) | 18.4% (792) |
| Less than High School | 26.7% (4,203) | 21.9% (943) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,588) | 16.5% (709) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gooding vs Waverly
- In Waverly, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Gooding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gooding hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Waverly.
- More residents in Gooding have less than a high school education at 26.7% compared to 21.9% in Waverly.
- In Waverly, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.