Demographics details for Gooding, ID vs Scott city, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gooding, ID vs Scott city, MO.
| Data | Gooding | Scott city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,715 | 4,350 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,938 | $57,771 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Gooding vs Scott city
- In Gooding, the population is higher at 15,715, compared to 4,350 in Scott city.
- The median age in Scott city is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 38.3 years in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher median income of $60,938 compared to $57,771 in Scott city.
- In Scott city, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Gooding.
- The poverty level is higher in Scott city at 9%, compared to 8% in Gooding.
- Scott city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.9% in Gooding.
Demographics
Demographics Gooding vs Scott city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gooding | Scott city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 60 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gooding vs Scott city
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gooding and Scott city at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scott city at 92% compared to 60% in Gooding.
- Both Gooding and Scott city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gooding at 29% compared to 3% in Scott city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gooding at 9% compared to 5% in Scott city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gooding at 2% compared to 0% in Scott city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gooding | Scott city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 27.3% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gooding vs Scott city
- In Scott city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.4% in Gooding.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Scott city at 27.3% versus 22.7% in Gooding.
- Scott city has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Gooding.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scott city at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Gooding.
- Scott city has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 36.9% in Gooding.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scott city at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Gooding.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gooding | Scott city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (131) | 0.4% (18) |
| High School Diploma | 19.5% (3,066) | 20.4% (886) |
| Less than High School | 26.7% (4,203) | 23.8% (1,035) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,588) | 10.9% (474) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gooding vs Scott city
- A higher percentage of residents in Gooding have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Scott city.
- In Scott city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 19.5% in Gooding.
- More residents in Gooding have less than a high school education at 26.7% compared to 23.8% in Scott city.
- In Scott city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.