Demographics details for Gooding, ID vs Methuen, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gooding, ID vs Methuen, MA.
| Data | Gooding | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,715 | 53,241 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $60,938 | $93,681 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Gooding vs Methuen
- The population in Methuen is higher at 53,241, compared to 15,715 in Gooding.
- The median age in Methuen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 38.3 years in Gooding.
- Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681, compared to $60,938 in Gooding.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gooding at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Methuen.
- The poverty level is identical in both Gooding and Methuen at 8%.
- Methuen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 2.9% in Gooding.
Demographics
Demographics Gooding vs Methuen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gooding | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 60 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gooding vs Methuen
- In Methuen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 51% in Methuen.
- In Methuen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Gooding.
- Methuen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 29% in Gooding.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Methuen at 10%, compared to 9% in Gooding.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gooding at 2% compared to 0% in Methuen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gooding | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gooding vs Methuen
- In Methuen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.4% in Gooding.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Methuen at 23.4% versus 22.7% in Gooding.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gooding at 18.0% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 15.6% in Gooding.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gooding at 36.9% compared to 30.4% in Methuen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gooding at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Methuen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gooding | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (131) | 1.4% (741) |
| High School Diploma | 19.5% (3,066) | 17.4% (9,266) |
| Less than High School | 26.7% (4,203) | 13.9% (7,384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,588) | 21.3% (11,336) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gooding vs Methuen
- In Methuen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Gooding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gooding hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
- More residents in Gooding have less than a high school education at 26.7% compared to 13.9% in Methuen.
- In Methuen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.