Demographics details for Gooding, ID vs Colorado springs, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gooding, ID vs Colorado springs, CO.

Data Gooding Colorado springs
Population 15,715 486,248
Median Age 38.3 years 35.1 years
Median Income $60,938 $79,026
Married Families 40.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 8% 11%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 4.0

Population Comparison: Gooding vs Colorado springs

  • The population in Colorado springs is higher at 486,248, compared to 15,715 in Gooding.
  • Residents in Gooding have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 35.1 years in Colorado springs.
  • Colorado springs has a higher median income of $79,026, compared to $60,938 in Gooding.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Gooding and Colorado springs at 40.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Colorado springs at 11%, compared to 8% in Gooding.
  • Colorado springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.9% in Gooding.

Demographics

Demographics Gooding vs Colorado springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gooding Colorado springs
Black Data is updating 6
White 60 61
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 29 18
Two or More Races 9 11
American Indian 2 1

Demographics Comparison: Gooding vs Colorado springs

  • In Colorado springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Gooding.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Colorado springs at 61% compared to 60% in Gooding.
  • In Colorado springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Gooding.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Gooding at 29% compared to 18% in Colorado springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colorado springs at 11%, compared to 9% in Gooding.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gooding at 2% compared to 1% in Colorado springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gooding Colorado springs
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.8% 10.8%
Depression 22.7% 25.4%
Smoking 18.0% 14.5%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 15.8%
Obesity 36.9% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gooding vs Colorado springs

  • More residents in Gooding report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 16.2% in Colorado springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Colorado springs at 25.4% versus 22.7% in Gooding.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Gooding at 18.0% compared to 14.5% in Colorado springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Colorado springs at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Gooding.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Gooding at 36.9% compared to 28.4% in Colorado springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Gooding at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Colorado springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gooding Colorado springs
No Schooling 0.8% (131) 0.7% (3,192)
High School Diploma 19.5% (3,066) 10.2% (49,754)
Less than High School 26.7% (4,203) 6.8% (33,298)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.1% (1,588) 27.3% (132,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Gooding vs Colorado springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gooding have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Colorado springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gooding hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 10.2% in Colorado springs.
  • More residents in Gooding have less than a high school education at 26.7% compared to 6.8% in Colorado springs.
  • In Colorado springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.