Demographics details for Goliad, TX vs Seaside park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Goliad, TX vs Seaside park, NJ.
| Data | Goliad | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,131 | 1,473 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $58,125 | $80,658 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Goliad vs Seaside park
- In Goliad, the population is higher at 7,131, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- The median age in Seaside park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 44.7 years in Goliad.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658, compared to $58,125 in Goliad.
- In Seaside park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 42.0% in Goliad.
- Goliad has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- The unemployment rate in Goliad is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.
Demographics
Demographics Goliad vs Seaside park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Goliad | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 46 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Goliad vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Goliad at 5% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Seaside park at 90% compared to 46% in Goliad.
- In Seaside park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Goliad.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Goliad at 36% compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Goliad at 13% compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Goliad and Seaside park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Goliad | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 13.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Goliad vs Seaside park
- More residents in Goliad report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seaside park at 23.1% versus 22.9% in Goliad.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Goliad at 16.4% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Goliad at 18.5% compared to 18.2% in Seaside park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Goliad at 37.9% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Goliad at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Seaside park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Goliad | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (44) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (1,337) | 22.2% (327) |
| Less than High School | 21.3% (1,516) | 3.3% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (900) | 56.3% (830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Goliad vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of residents in Goliad have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 18.7% in Goliad.
- More residents in Goliad have less than a high school education at 21.3% compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 12.6% in Goliad.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.