Demographics details for Goleta, CA vs Glen elder, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Goleta, CA vs Glen elder, KS.
| Data | Goleta | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,432 | 363 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $113,889 | $65,417 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 80.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Goleta vs Glen elder
- In Goleta, the population is higher at 32,432, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
- The median age in Glen elder is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 35.0 years in Goleta.
- Goleta has a higher median income of $113,889 compared to $65,417 in Glen elder.
- In Glen elder, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 37.0% in Goleta.
- The poverty level is higher in Glen elder at 10%, compared to 8% in Goleta.
- The unemployment rate in Goleta is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.
Demographics
Demographics Goleta vs Glen elder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Goleta | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 34 | 86 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Goleta vs Glen elder
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Goleta at 3% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Glen elder at 86% compared to 34% in Goleta.
- The Asian population is larger in Goleta at 11% compared to 2% in Glen elder.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Goleta at 37% compared to 7% in Glen elder.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Goleta at 14% compared to 5% in Glen elder.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Goleta at 1% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Goleta | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Goleta vs Glen elder
- In Glen elder, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.9% in Goleta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Glen elder at 21.3% versus 18.1% in Goleta.
- Glen elder has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 9.8% in Goleta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 17.0% in Goleta.
- Glen elder has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 26.7% in Goleta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Goleta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Goleta | Glen elder |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (836) | 0.6% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 7.0% (2,263) | 30.3% (110) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (5,090) | 1.7% (6) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.6% (10,582) | 16.5% (60) |
Education Levels Comparison: Goleta vs Glen elder
- A higher percentage of residents in Goleta have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.6% in Glen elder.
- In Glen elder, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 7.0% in Goleta.
- More residents in Goleta have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Goleta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.6% compared to 16.5% in Glen elder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.