Demographics details for Golden, CO vs Sneads ferry, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Golden, CO vs Sneads ferry, NC.
| Data | Golden | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,460 | 2,140 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $90,990 | $40,278 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Golden vs Sneads ferry
- In Golden, the population is higher at 20,460, compared to 2,140 in Sneads ferry.
- The median age in Sneads ferry is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Golden.
- Golden has a higher median income of $90,990 compared to $40,278 in Sneads ferry.
- In Sneads ferry, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 36.0% in Golden.
- The poverty level is higher in Sneads ferry at 9%, compared to 0% in Golden.
- Sneads ferry has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Golden.
Demographics
Demographics Golden vs Sneads ferry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Golden | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 80 | 89 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Golden vs Sneads ferry
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Golden at 2% compared to 1% in Sneads ferry.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sneads ferry at 89% compared to 80% in Golden.
- Both Golden and Sneads ferry have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Golden at 10% compared to 6% in Sneads ferry.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Golden at 6% compared to 2% in Sneads ferry.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Golden and Sneads ferry at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Golden | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.0% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Golden vs Sneads ferry
- In Sneads ferry, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.9% in Golden.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sneads ferry at 23.8% versus 20.2% in Golden.
- Sneads ferry has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 13.5% in Golden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Golden at 22.0% compared to 18.6% in Sneads ferry.
- Sneads ferry has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 24.7% in Golden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sneads ferry at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Golden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Golden | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (40) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (2,094) | 23.2% (496) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (1,085) | 17.9% (382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (7,177) | 10.2% (219) |
Education Levels Comparison: Golden vs Sneads ferry
- A higher percentage of residents in Golden have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Sneads ferry.
- In Sneads ferry, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 10.2% in Golden.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sneads ferry at 17.9%, compared to 5.3% in Golden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Golden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 10.2% in Sneads ferry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.