Demographics details for Golden, CO vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Golden, CO vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Golden | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,460 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $90,990 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Golden vs Port gibson
- In Golden, the population is higher at 20,460, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Golden.
- Golden has a higher median income of $90,990 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Golden at 36.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 0% in Golden.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.5% in Golden.
Demographics
Demographics Golden vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Golden | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 82 |
| White | 80 | 12 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Golden vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 2% in Golden.
- Golden has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- The Asian population is larger in Golden at 2% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Golden at 10% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- Both Golden and Port gibson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Golden and Port gibson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Golden | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.0% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Golden vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.9% in Golden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Golden at 20.2% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 13.5% in Golden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Golden at 22.0% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 24.7% in Golden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Golden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Golden | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (40) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (2,094) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (1,085) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (7,177) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Golden vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Golden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Golden hold a high school diploma at 10.2% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port gibson at 13.3%, compared to 5.3% in Golden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Golden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.