Demographics details for Golden, CO vs Centralia, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Golden, CO vs Centralia, WA.
| Data | Golden | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,460 | 18,773 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $90,990 | $50,422 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Golden vs Centralia
- In Golden, the population is higher at 20,460, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 35.2 years in Golden.
- Golden has a higher median income of $90,990 compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Golden at 36.0% compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 14%, compared to 0% in Golden.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 2.5% in Golden.
Demographics
Demographics Golden vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Golden | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 80 | 70 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Golden vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Golden at 2% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Golden has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 70% in Centralia.
- The Asian population is larger in Golden at 2% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 10% in Golden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 11%, compared to 6% in Golden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Golden and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Golden | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 27.5% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.0% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Golden vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.9% in Golden.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 27.5% versus 20.2% in Golden.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 13.5% in Golden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Golden at 22.0% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 24.7% in Golden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Golden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Golden | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (40) | 1.1% (214) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (2,094) | 17.6% (3,312) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (1,085) | 19.3% (3,617) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (7,177) | 11.6% (2,187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Golden vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Golden.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 10.2% in Golden.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 19.3%, compared to 5.3% in Golden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Golden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.