Demographics details for Goessel, KS vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Goessel, KS vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Goessel | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 562 | 994 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,972 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Goessel vs Mc graw
- The population in Mc graw is higher at 994, compared to 562 in Goessel.
- Residents in Goessel have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $55,972 in Goessel.
- In Mc graw, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Goessel.
- The poverty level is identical in both Goessel and Mc graw at 7%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Goessel and Mc graw at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Goessel vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Goessel | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Goessel vs Mc graw
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Goessel and Mc graw at 0%.
- Goessel has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 88% in Mc graw.
- Both Goessel and Mc graw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Mc graw has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Goessel.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 4% in Goessel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Goessel and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Goessel | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Goessel vs Mc graw
- In Mc graw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.8% in Goessel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 21.8% in Goessel.
- Mc graw has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.4% in Goessel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Goessel.
- Mc graw has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.6% in Goessel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Goessel at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Mc graw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Goessel | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (112) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (36) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.0% (107) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Goessel vs Mc graw
- In Mc graw, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Goessel.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 19.9% in Goessel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 6.4% in Goessel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Goessel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.