Demographics details for Godley, TX vs South plainfield, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Godley, TX vs South plainfield, NJ.
Data | Godley | South plainfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,674 | 24,228 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $56,792 | $123,417 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Godley vs South plainfield
- The population in South plainfield is higher at 24,228, compared to 2,674 in Godley.
- The median age in South plainfield is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 33.7 years in Godley.
- South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417, compared to $56,792 in Godley.
- In South plainfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 33.0% in Godley.
- Godley has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in South plainfield.
- South plainfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Godley.
Demographics
Demographics Godley vs South plainfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Godley | South plainfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 12 |
White | 81 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | 17 |
Hispanic | 15 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Godley vs South plainfield
- In South plainfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Godley.
- Godley has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
- In South plainfield, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 0% in Godley.
- South plainfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 15% in Godley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South plainfield at 7%, compared to 3% in Godley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Godley and South plainfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Godley | South plainfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 9.0% |
Depression | 24.3% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 12.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 29.0% |
Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Godley vs South plainfield
- More residents in Godley report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Godley at 24.3% compared to 19.0% in South plainfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Godley at 18.1% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Godley at 19.7% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Godley at 34.6% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South plainfield at 9.0% compared to 4.0% in Godley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Godley | South plainfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (27) | 1.4% (328) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (350) | 16.6% (4,012) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (260) | 9.0% (2,175) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (171) | 31.5% (7,629) |
Education Levels Comparison: Godley vs South plainfield
- In South plainfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Godley.
- In South plainfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 13.1% in Godley.
- More residents in Godley have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
- In South plainfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 6.4% in Godley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.