Demographics details for Godley, TX vs Safford, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Godley, TX vs Safford, AZ.
| Data | Godley | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,674 | 10,297 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $56,792 | $64,860 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Godley vs Safford
- The population in Safford is higher at 10,297, compared to 2,674 in Godley.
- Residents in Godley have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860, compared to $56,792 in Godley.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Godley and Safford at 33.0%.
- Godley has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Godley.
Demographics
Demographics Godley vs Safford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Godley | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 81 | 31 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Godley vs Safford
- In Safford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Godley.
- Godley has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 31% in Safford.
- In Safford, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Godley.
- Safford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 15% in Godley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Safford at 15%, compared to 3% in Godley.
- In Safford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Godley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Godley | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Godley vs Safford
- More residents in Godley report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Godley at 24.3% compared to 19.9% in Safford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Godley at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Godley at 19.7% compared to 17.0% in Safford.
- Safford has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 34.6% in Godley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Safford at 14.0% compared to 4.0% in Godley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Godley | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (27) | 2.7% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (350) | 11.1% (1,147) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (260) | 17.7% (1,825) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (171) | 10.6% (1,092) |
Education Levels Comparison: Godley vs Safford
- In Safford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.0% in Godley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Godley hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Safford at 17.7%, compared to 9.7% in Godley.
- In Safford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 6.4% in Godley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.