Demographics details for Godley, TX vs Parsons, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Godley, TX vs Parsons, KS.
| Data | Godley | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,674 | 9,382 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $56,792 | $48,990 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Godley vs Parsons
- The population in Parsons is higher at 9,382, compared to 2,674 in Godley.
- The median age in Parsons is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in Godley.
- Godley has a higher median income of $56,792 compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- In Parsons, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Godley.
- The poverty level is higher in Parsons at 12%, compared to 11% in Godley.
- Parsons has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Godley.
Demographics
Demographics Godley vs Parsons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Godley | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 81 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Godley vs Parsons
- In Parsons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Godley.
- Godley has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 79% in Parsons.
- Both Godley and Parsons have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Godley at 15% compared to 7% in Parsons.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parsons at 6%, compared to 3% in Godley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Godley and Parsons at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Godley | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 45.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Godley vs Parsons
- In Parsons, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.8% in Godley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Godley at 24.3% compared to 22.3% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 18.1% in Godley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Godley at 19.7% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
- Parsons has higher obesity rates at 45.2% compared to 34.6% in Godley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 4.0% in Godley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Godley | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (27) | 1.2% (113) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (350) | 15.2% (1,423) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (260) | 11.6% (1,093) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (171) | 17.3% (1,621) |
Education Levels Comparison: Godley vs Parsons
- In Parsons, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Godley.
- In Parsons, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 13.1% in Godley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parsons at 11.6%, compared to 9.7% in Godley.
- In Parsons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 6.4% in Godley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.