Demographics details for Gloverville, SC vs Sterling, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gloverville, SC vs Sterling, OK.
| Data | Gloverville | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,099 | 678 |
| Median Age | 31.4 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,643 | $64,464 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gloverville vs Sterling
- In Gloverville, the population is higher at 3,099, compared to 678 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $64,464, compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Gloverville and Sterling at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Gloverville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Gloverville vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gloverville | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | Data is updating |
| White | 76 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gloverville vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gloverville at 18% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 82% compared to 76% in Gloverville.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Gloverville and Sterling at 6%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 11%, compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gloverville and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gloverville | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gloverville vs Sterling
- More residents in Gloverville report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.9% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling at 28.2% versus 24.7% in Gloverville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gloverville at 25.0% compared to 20.1% in Sterling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling at 16.4% compared to 16.1% in Gloverville.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 39.3% in Gloverville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 40.0% compared to 24.0% in Gloverville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gloverville | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 29.9% (927) | 45.0% (305) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (610) | 11.2% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.3% (134) | 6.5% (44) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gloverville vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Gloverville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 45.0% compared to 29.9% in Gloverville.
- More residents in Gloverville have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 11.2% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.5% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.