Demographics details for Gloverville, SC vs Grayson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gloverville, SC vs Grayson, GA.
Data | Gloverville | Grayson |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,099 | 4,753 |
Median Age | 31.4 years | 31.2 years |
Median Income | $46,643 | $121,421 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gloverville vs Grayson
- The population in Grayson is higher at 4,753, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
- Residents in Gloverville have a higher median age of 31.4 years compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421, compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
- In Grayson, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Grayson.
- The unemployment rate in Gloverville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Gloverville vs Grayson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gloverville | Grayson |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 74 |
White | 76 | 20 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gloverville vs Grayson
- In Grayson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 18% in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Grayson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Gloverville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gloverville at 6% compared to 4% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grayson at 1%, compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gloverville and Grayson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gloverville | Grayson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 8.5% |
Depression | 24.7% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 25.0% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 39.3% | 28.5% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gloverville vs Grayson
- More residents in Gloverville report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gloverville at 24.7% compared to 17.5% in Grayson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gloverville at 25.0% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gloverville at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gloverville at 39.3% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gloverville | Grayson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 29.9% (927) | 14.8% (703) |
Less than High School | 19.7% (610) | 6.4% (302) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.3% (134) | 24.7% (1,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gloverville vs Grayson
- A higher percentage of residents in Gloverville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gloverville hold a high school diploma at 29.9% compared to 14.8% in Grayson.
- More residents in Gloverville have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 6.4% in Grayson.
- In Grayson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.