Demographics details for Glenwood, AR vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glenwood, AR vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Glenwood | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,064 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 45.3 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $33,958 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Glenwood vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 2,064 in Glenwood.
- Residents in Glenwood have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher median income of $35,649, compared to $33,958 in Glenwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glenwood at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 15% in Glenwood.
- The unemployment rate in Glenwood is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Picayune.
Demographics
Demographics Glenwood vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glenwood | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 38 |
| White | 75 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glenwood vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 2% in Glenwood.
- Glenwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Glenwood and Picayune have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glenwood at 21% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Picayune at 5%, compared to 1% in Glenwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glenwood at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glenwood | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 26.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glenwood vs Picayune
- More residents in Glenwood report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Picayune.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glenwood at 26.9% compared to 24.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 22.1% in Glenwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glenwood at 14.9% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Glenwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glenwood at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Picayune.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glenwood | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.9% (142) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (399) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 21.3% (440) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (219) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glenwood vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Glenwood have no formal schooling at 6.9% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glenwood hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- More residents in Glenwood have less than a high school education at 21.3% compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glenwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.