Demographics details for Glenpool, OK vs Pittsburg, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glenpool, OK vs Pittsburg, CA.

Data Glenpool Pittsburg
Population 14,211 77,572
Median Age 34.3 years 35.2 years
Median Income $75,876 $98,408
Married Families 42.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.3

Population Comparison: Glenpool vs Pittsburg

  • The population in Pittsburg is higher at 77,572, compared to 14,211 in Glenpool.
  • The median age in Pittsburg is higher at 35.2 years, compared to 34.3 years in Glenpool.
  • Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408, compared to $75,876 in Glenpool.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glenpool at 42.0% compared to 37.0% in Pittsburg.
  • Glenpool has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
  • Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Glenpool.

Demographics

Demographics Glenpool vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glenpool Pittsburg
Black 3 15
White 61 9
Asian 4 18
Hispanic 9 43
Two or More Races 14 14
American Indian 9 1

Demographics Comparison: Glenpool vs Pittsburg

  • In Pittsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Glenpool.
  • Glenpool has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
  • In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Glenpool.
  • Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 9% in Glenpool.
  • Both Glenpool and Pittsburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 14%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glenpool at 9% compared to 1% in Pittsburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glenpool Pittsburg
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 11.8%
Depression 26.0% 16.7%
Smoking 16.3% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 15.0%
Obesity 34.9% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glenpool vs Pittsburg

  • More residents in Glenpool report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Glenpool at 26.0% compared to 16.7% in Pittsburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Glenpool at 16.3% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glenpool at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Glenpool at 34.9% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsburg at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Glenpool.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glenpool Pittsburg
No Schooling 0.7% (96) 3.1% (2,439)
High School Diploma 14.2% (2,018) 14.5% (11,263)
Less than High School 8.9% (1,258) 23.3% (18,048)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.4% (2,184) 14.8% (11,476)

Education Levels Comparison: Glenpool vs Pittsburg

  • In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.7% in Glenpool.
  • In Pittsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 14.2% in Glenpool.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsburg at 23.3%, compared to 8.9% in Glenpool.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glenpool hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.