Demographics details for Glenpool, OK vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glenpool, OK vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Glenpool | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,211 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $75,876 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Glenpool vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 14,211 in Glenpool.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 34.3 years in Glenpool.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $75,876 in Glenpool.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glenpool at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 6% in Glenpool.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Glenpool.
Demographics
Demographics Glenpool vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glenpool | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 15 |
| White | 61 | 23 |
| Asian | 4 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 14 |
| American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glenpool vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Glenpool.
- Glenpool has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Glenpool.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 9% in Glenpool.
- Both Glenpool and Fairfield have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 14%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glenpool at 9% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glenpool | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glenpool vs Fairfield
- More residents in Glenpool report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glenpool at 26.0% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glenpool at 16.3% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 16.1% compared to 15.1% in Glenpool.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glenpool at 34.9% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Glenpool.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glenpool | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (96) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (2,018) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (1,258) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (2,184) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glenpool vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Glenpool.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glenpool hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 8.9% in Glenpool.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Glenpool.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.