Demographics details for Glendora, CA vs Madisonville, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glendora, CA vs Madisonville, KY.

Data Glendora Madisonville
Population 50,824 19,214
Median Age 40.4 years 37.3 years
Median Income $106,718 $54,234
Married Families 43.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Glendora vs Madisonville

  • In Glendora, the population is higher at 50,824, compared to 19,214 in Madisonville.
  • Residents in Glendora have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.3 years in Madisonville.
  • Glendora has a higher median income of $106,718 compared to $54,234 in Madisonville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glendora at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Madisonville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Madisonville at 14%, compared to 10% in Glendora.
  • The unemployment rate in Glendora is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Madisonville.

Demographics

Demographics Glendora vs Madisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glendora Madisonville
Black 3 12
White 26 75
Asian 12 1
Hispanic 41 4
Two or More Races 17 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Glendora vs Madisonville

  • In Madisonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Glendora.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Madisonville at 75% compared to 26% in Glendora.
  • The Asian population is larger in Glendora at 12% compared to 1% in Madisonville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Glendora at 41% compared to 4% in Madisonville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Glendora at 17% compared to 7% in Madisonville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glendora and Madisonville at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glendora Madisonville
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 19.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 14.9%
Depression 16.9% 27.8%
Smoking 9.4% 23.8%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 14.3%
Obesity 26.3% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glendora vs Madisonville

  • In Madisonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.7% in Glendora.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Madisonville at 27.8% versus 16.9% in Glendora.
  • Madisonville has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 9.4% in Glendora.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glendora at 17.1% compared to 14.3% in Madisonville.
  • Madisonville has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 26.3% in Glendora.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Madisonville at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Glendora.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glendora Madisonville
No Schooling 0.9% (433) 0.7% (126)
High School Diploma 13.8% (7,021) 18.4% (3,529)
Less than High School 9.4% (4,801) 13.0% (2,491)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.5% (13,482) 14.0% (2,694)

Education Levels Comparison: Glendora vs Madisonville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Glendora have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Madisonville.
  • In Madisonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.8% in Glendora.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Madisonville at 13.0%, compared to 9.4% in Glendora.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glendora hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 14.0% in Madisonville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.