Demographics details for Glendora, CA vs Chattanooga, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendora, CA vs Chattanooga, TN.
Data | Glendora | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
Population | 50,824 | 184,086 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $106,718 | $57,703 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Glendora vs Chattanooga
- The population in Chattanooga is higher at 184,086, compared to 50,824 in Glendora.
- Residents in Glendora have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Chattanooga.
- Glendora has a higher median income of $106,718 compared to $57,703 in Chattanooga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glendora at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Chattanooga.
- The poverty level is higher in Chattanooga at 18%, compared to 10% in Glendora.
- The unemployment rate in Glendora is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Chattanooga.
Demographics
Demographics Glendora vs Chattanooga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Glendora | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 29 |
White | 26 | 56 |
Asian | 12 | 2 |
Hispanic | 41 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glendora vs Chattanooga
- In Chattanooga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 3% in Glendora.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chattanooga at 56% compared to 26% in Glendora.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendora at 12% compared to 2% in Chattanooga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendora at 41% compared to 7% in Chattanooga.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendora at 17% compared to 6% in Chattanooga.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glendora at 1% compared to 0% in Chattanooga.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Glendora | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.2% |
Depression | 16.9% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 26.3% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendora vs Chattanooga
- In Chattanooga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.7% in Glendora.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chattanooga at 25.9% versus 16.9% in Glendora.
- Chattanooga has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 9.4% in Glendora.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glendora at 17.1% compared to 14.5% in Chattanooga.
- Chattanooga has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 26.3% in Glendora.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chattanooga at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Glendora.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Glendora | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (433) | 0.9% (1,744) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (7,021) | 13.9% (25,521) |
Less than High School | 9.4% (4,801) | 11.8% (21,703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.5% (13,482) | 23.4% (43,030) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendora vs Chattanooga
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Glendora and Chattanooga at 0.9%.
- In Chattanooga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 13.8% in Glendora.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chattanooga at 11.8%, compared to 9.4% in Glendora.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendora hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 23.4% in Chattanooga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.