Demographics details for Glendale, CA vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, CA vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Glendale | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 189,221 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $81,219 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Lawrence
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 189,221, compared to 95,794 in Lawrence.
- Residents in Glendale have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $81,219 compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glendale at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 12%, compared to 11% in Glendale.
- The unemployment rate in Glendale is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glendale | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 58 | 71 |
| Asian | 14 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Glendale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawrence at 71% compared to 58% in Glendale.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 14% compared to 6% in Lawrence.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 19% compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 9%, compared to 7% in Glendale.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Glendale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glendale | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 25.9% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.7% in Glendale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.3% versus 17.5% in Glendale.
- Lawrence has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 11.3% in Glendale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 15.8% in Glendale.
- Lawrence has higher obesity rates at 32.8% compared to 25.9% in Glendale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glendale at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glendale | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (4,374) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (28,860) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (31,289) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (63,225) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Glendale have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 31.1% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.