Demographics details for Glendale, CA vs Grayling, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, CA vs Grayling, MI.
| Data | Glendale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 189,221 | 1,917 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 48.8 years |
| Median Income | $81,219 | $30,417 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Grayling
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 189,221, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- The median age in Grayling is higher at 48.8 years, compared to 41.1 years in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $81,219 compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glendale at 42.0% compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- The poverty level is higher in Grayling at 16%, compared to 11% in Glendale.
- The unemployment rate in Glendale is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Grayling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glendale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 58 | 88 |
| Asian | 14 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Grayling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glendale at 2% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grayling at 88% compared to 58% in Glendale.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 14% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 19% compared to 7% in Grayling.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 7% compared to 3% in Grayling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glendale and Grayling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glendale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 25.9% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Glendale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grayling at 26.4% versus 17.5% in Glendale.
- Grayling has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.3% in Glendale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grayling at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in Glendale.
- Grayling has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 25.9% in Glendale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glendale | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (4,374) | 0.7% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (28,860) | 17.3% (332) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (31,289) | 18.2% (348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (63,225) | 10.3% (197) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Grayling
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.7% in Grayling.
- In Grayling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 15.3% in Glendale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grayling at 18.2%, compared to 16.5% in Glendale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 10.3% in Grayling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.