Demographics details for Glendale, CA vs Cummington, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, CA vs Cummington, MA.
Data | Glendale | Cummington |
---|---|---|
Population | 189,221 | 878 |
Median Age | 41.1 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $81,219 | $75,000 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Cummington
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 189,221, compared to 878 in Cummington.
- The median age in Cummington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 41.1 years in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $81,219 compared to $75,000 in Cummington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glendale at 42.0% compared to 20.0% in Cummington.
- Glendale has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Cummington.
- The unemployment rate in Glendale is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.3% in Cummington.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Cummington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Glendale | Cummington |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 58 | 97 |
Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Cummington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glendale at 2% compared to 1% in Cummington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cummington at 97% compared to 58% in Glendale.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 14% compared to 0% in Cummington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 19% compared to 1% in Cummington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 7% compared to 1% in Cummington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glendale and Cummington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Glendale | Cummington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 11.3% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 25.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Cummington
- More residents in Glendale report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glendale at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glendale at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glendale at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glendale at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glendale at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Glendale | Cummington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.3% (4,374) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (28,860) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 16.5% (31,289) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (63,225) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Cummington
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- More residents in Glendale have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.