Demographics details for Glendale, AZ vs Manassas park, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, AZ vs Manassas park, VA.
Data | Glendale | Manassas park |
---|---|---|
Population | 252,136 | 16,703 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $66,375 | $91,673 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Manassas park
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 252,136, compared to 16,703 in Manassas park.
- The median age in Manassas park is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
- Manassas park has a higher median income of $91,673, compared to $66,375 in Glendale.
- In Manassas park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Manassas park.
- The unemployment rate in Glendale is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Manassas park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Glendale | Manassas park |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 15 |
White | 28 | 16 |
Asian | 4 | 11 |
Hispanic | 40 | 43 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 12 |
American Indian | 2 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Manassas park
- In Manassas park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 7% in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to 16% in Manassas park.
- In Manassas park, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 4% in Glendale.
- Manassas park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 40% in Glendale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 19% compared to 12% in Manassas park.
- In Manassas park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Glendale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Glendale | Manassas park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 10.7% |
Depression | 20.2% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Manassas park
- More residents in Glendale report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.4% in Manassas park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glendale at 20.2% compared to 20.0% in Manassas park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glendale at 17.2% compared to 14.6% in Manassas park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glendale at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Manassas park.
- Manassas park has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glendale at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Manassas park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Glendale | Manassas park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (4,190) | 6.2% (1,032) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (37,119) | 18.3% (3,054) |
Less than High School | 18.6% (46,911) | 25.9% (4,321) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (35,878) | 17.0% (2,847) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Manassas park
- In Manassas park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.7% in Glendale.
- In Manassas park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manassas park at 25.9%, compared to 18.6% in Glendale.
- In Manassas park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 14.2% in Glendale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.