Demographics details for Glendale, AZ vs Goliad, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, AZ vs Goliad, TX.
Data | Glendale | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Population | 252,136 | 7,131 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $66,375 | $58,125 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Goliad
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 252,136, compared to 7,131 in Goliad.
- The median age in Goliad is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375 compared to $58,125 in Goliad.
- In Goliad, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- The poverty level is higher in Goliad at 12%, compared to 11% in Glendale.
- Goliad has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Glendale.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Goliad provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Glendale | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 5 |
White | 28 | 46 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 40 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 13 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glendale at 7% compared to 5% in Goliad.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Goliad at 46% compared to 28% in Glendale.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 4% compared to 0% in Goliad.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 40% compared to 36% in Goliad.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 19% compared to 13% in Goliad.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glendale at 2% compared to 0% in Goliad.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Glendale | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 12.0% |
Depression | 20.2% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Goliad
- More residents in Glendale report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Goliad.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Goliad at 22.9% versus 20.2% in Glendale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glendale at 17.2% compared to 16.4% in Goliad.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Goliad at 18.5% compared to 16.8% in Glendale.
- Goliad has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Goliad at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Glendale | Goliad |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (4,190) | 0.6% (44) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (37,119) | 18.7% (1,337) |
Less than High School | 18.6% (46,911) | 21.3% (1,516) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (35,878) | 12.6% (900) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Goliad.
- In Goliad, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Goliad at 21.3%, compared to 18.6% in Glendale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 12.6% in Goliad.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.