Demographics details for Glendale, AZ vs Garfield, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, AZ vs Garfield, WA.
| Data | Glendale | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,136 | 2,363 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 49.9 years |
| Median Income | $66,375 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Garfield
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 252,136, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- The median age in Garfield is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375 compared to $57,958 in Garfield.
- In Garfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Garfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.6% in Glendale.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Garfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glendale | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 28 | 88 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 40 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Garfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glendale at 7% compared to 1% in Garfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Garfield at 88% compared to 28% in Glendale.
- The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 4% compared to 1% in Garfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 40% compared to 4% in Garfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 19% compared to 6% in Garfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glendale at 2% compared to 0% in Garfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glendale | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 28.7% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Garfield
- More residents in Glendale report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.2% in Garfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garfield at 28.7% versus 20.2% in Glendale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glendale at 17.2% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garfield at 18.2% compared to 16.8% in Glendale.
- Garfield has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glendale | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (4,190) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (37,119) | 15.7% (371) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (46,911) | 10.2% (242) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (35,878) | 19.4% (458) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Garfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Garfield.
- In Garfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
- More residents in Glendale have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 10.2% in Garfield.
- In Garfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.2% in Glendale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.