Demographics details for Glendale, AZ vs Covina, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, AZ vs Covina, CA.
| Data | Glendale | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 252,136 | 49,489 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $66,375 | $89,650 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Glendale vs Covina
- In Glendale, the population is higher at 252,136, compared to 49,489 in Covina.
- The median age in Covina is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
- Covina has a higher median income of $89,650, compared to $66,375 in Glendale.
- In Covina, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- The poverty level is higher in Covina at 12%, compared to 11% in Glendale.
- Covina has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.6% in Glendale.
Demographics
Demographics Glendale vs Covina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glendale | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 4 |
| White | 28 | 18 |
| Asian | 4 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 40 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 19 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Covina
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glendale at 7% compared to 4% in Covina.
- Glendale has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to 18% in Covina.
- In Covina, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 4% in Glendale.
- Covina has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 40% in Glendale.
- Both Glendale and Covina have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 19%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glendale at 2% compared to 1% in Covina.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glendale | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Covina
- More residents in Glendale report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Covina.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glendale at 20.2% compared to 15.9% in Covina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glendale at 17.2% compared to 10.5% in Covina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glendale at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Covina.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glendale at 32.9% compared to 28.2% in Covina.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glendale at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Covina.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glendale | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (4,190) | 1.5% (753) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (37,119) | 17.4% (8,620) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (46,911) | 17.2% (8,533) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (35,878) | 18.7% (9,254) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Covina
- A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.5% in Covina.
- In Covina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
- More residents in Glendale have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 17.2% in Covina.
- In Covina, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in Glendale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.