Demographics details for Glen rock, NJ vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glen rock, NJ vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Glen rock | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,039 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $202,586 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Glen rock vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 12,039 in Glen rock.
- Residents in Glen rock have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Glen rock has a higher median income of $202,586 compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen rock at 49.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 0% in Glen rock.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Glen rock.
Demographics
Demographics Glen rock vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glen rock | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | 75 | 53 |
| Asian | 15 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Glen rock vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Glen rock.
- Glen rock has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Glen rock at 15% compared to 9% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Glen rock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 5% in Glen rock.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Glen rock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glen rock | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.5% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 22.8% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glen rock vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 11.9% in Glen rock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 16.8% in Glen rock.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 8.2% in Glen rock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glen rock at 18.8% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 22.8% in Glen rock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Glen rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glen rock | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (106) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 4.7% (566) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (323) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.0% (5,303) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glen rock vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Glen rock.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 4.7% in Glen rock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 2.7% in Glen rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen rock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.0% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.