Demographics details for Glen ellyn, IL vs Buchanan dam, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glen ellyn, IL vs Buchanan dam, TX.

Data Glen ellyn Buchanan dam
Population 28,364 1,274
Median Age 41.6 years 65.5 years
Median Income $128,132 $66,250
Married Families 48.0% 66.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 4.5

Population Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Buchanan dam

  • In Glen ellyn, the population is higher at 28,364, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
  • The median age in Buchanan dam is higher at 65.5 years, compared to 41.6 years in Glen ellyn.
  • Glen ellyn has a higher median income of $128,132 compared to $66,250 in Buchanan dam.
  • In Buchanan dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 66.0%, compared to 48.0% in Glen ellyn.
  • The poverty level is higher in Buchanan dam at 8%, compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
  • The unemployment rate in Glen ellyn is higher at 5.6%, compared to 4.5% in Buchanan dam.

Demographics

Demographics Glen ellyn vs Buchanan dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glen ellyn Buchanan dam
Black 3 Data is updating
White 78 82
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 11
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Buchanan dam

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glen ellyn at 3% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Buchanan dam at 82% compared to 78% in Glen ellyn.
  • The Asian population is larger in Glen ellyn at 9% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
  • Buchanan dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Buchanan dam at 6%, compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
  • In Buchanan dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Glen ellyn.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glen ellyn Buchanan dam
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 11.8%
Depression 17.3% 25.0%
Smoking 9.4% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 19.0%
Obesity 29.2% 36.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Buchanan dam

  • In Buchanan dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 11.9% in Glen ellyn.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Buchanan dam at 25.0% versus 17.3% in Glen ellyn.
  • Buchanan dam has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 9.4% in Glen ellyn.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Buchanan dam at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in Glen ellyn.
  • Buchanan dam has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 29.2% in Glen ellyn.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Glen ellyn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glen ellyn Buchanan dam
No Schooling 0.3% (93) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 6.4% (1,815) 26.5% (338)
Less than High School 4.1% (1,149) 4.6% (58)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.8% (12,997) 23.2% (296)

Education Levels Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Buchanan dam

  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen ellyn have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
  • In Buchanan dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 6.4% in Glen ellyn.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Buchanan dam at 4.6%, compared to 4.1% in Glen ellyn.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen ellyn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.8% compared to 23.2% in Buchanan dam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.