Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Yazoo city, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Yazoo city, MS.

Data Glen elder Yazoo city
Population 363 9,844
Median Age 42.7 years 31.5 years
Median Income $65,417 $31,310
Married Families 80.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 10% 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 6.0

Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Yazoo city

  • The population in Yazoo city is higher at 9,844, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
  • Residents in Glen elder have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 31.5 years in Yazoo city.
  • Glen elder has a higher median income of $65,417 compared to $31,310 in Yazoo city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 18.0% in Yazoo city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Yazoo city at 25%, compared to 10% in Glen elder.
  • Yazoo city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.

Demographics

Demographics Glen elder vs Yazoo city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glen elder Yazoo city
Black Data is updating 96
White 86 3
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Yazoo city

  • In Yazoo city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 96% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
  • Glen elder has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 3% in Yazoo city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Glen elder at 2% compared to 0% in Yazoo city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Glen elder at 7% compared to 0% in Yazoo city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Glen elder at 5% compared to 1% in Yazoo city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen elder and Yazoo city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glen elder Yazoo city
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 21.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 19.0%
Depression 21.3% 21.9%
Smoking 17.7% 31.1%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 9.7%
Obesity 38.5% 52.1%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Yazoo city

  • In Yazoo city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 15.8% in Glen elder.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Yazoo city at 21.9% versus 21.3% in Glen elder.
  • Yazoo city has a higher smoking rate at 31.1% compared to 17.7% in Glen elder.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 9.7% in Yazoo city.
  • Yazoo city has higher obesity rates at 52.1% compared to 38.5% in Glen elder.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Yazoo city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glen elder Yazoo city
No Schooling 0.6% (2) 1.6% (155)
High School Diploma 30.3% (110) 24.5% (2,407)
Less than High School 1.7% (6) 17.0% (1,671)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.5% (60) 6.5% (642)

Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Yazoo city

  • In Yazoo city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Glen elder.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 24.5% in Yazoo city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yazoo city at 17.0%, compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 6.5% in Yazoo city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.