Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Glen elder | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $65,417 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 80.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Sulphur
- The population in Sulphur is higher at 4,951, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
- Residents in Glen elder have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Glen elder has a higher median income of $65,417 compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 10% in Glen elder.
- Sulphur has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.
Demographics
Demographics Glen elder vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glen elder | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 86 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
- Glen elder has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- The Asian population is larger in Glen elder at 2% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 7% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 5% in Glen elder.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Glen elder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glen elder | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.8% in Glen elder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 25.3% versus 21.3% in Glen elder.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 17.7% in Glen elder.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 38.5% in Glen elder.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Sulphur.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glen elder | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (2) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (110) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 1.7% (6) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (60) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 18.2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.