Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Murrieta, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Murrieta, CA.
| Data | Glen elder | Murrieta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 113,783 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $65,417 | $106,925 |
| Married Families | 80.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Murrieta
- The population in Murrieta is higher at 113,783, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
- Residents in Glen elder have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 35.6 years in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher median income of $106,925, compared to $65,417 in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 41.0% in Murrieta.
- Glen elder has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.
Demographics
Demographics Glen elder vs Murrieta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glen elder | Murrieta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 86 | 38 |
| Asian | 2 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Murrieta
- In Murrieta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
- Glen elder has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 38% in Murrieta.
- In Murrieta, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Glen elder.
- Murrieta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 7% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Murrieta at 15%, compared to 5% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen elder and Murrieta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glen elder | Murrieta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 17.3% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Murrieta
- More residents in Glen elder report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Murrieta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glen elder at 21.3% compared to 17.3% in Murrieta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glen elder at 17.7% compared to 11.3% in Murrieta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 17.6% in Murrieta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glen elder at 38.5% compared to 32.5% in Murrieta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrieta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glen elder | Murrieta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (2) | 1.2% (1,387) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (110) | 11.8% (13,439) |
| Less than High School | 1.7% (6) | 8.4% (9,580) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (60) | 18.6% (21,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Murrieta
- In Murrieta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 11.8% in Murrieta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Murrieta at 8.4%, compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
- In Murrieta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 16.5% in Glen elder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.