Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Hot springs village, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Hot springs village, AR.

Data Glen elder Hot springs village
Population 363 16,843
Median Age 42.7 years 69.7 years
Median Income $65,417 $68,580
Married Families 80.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 10% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Hot springs village

  • The population in Hot springs village is higher at 16,843, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
  • The median age in Hot springs village is higher at 69.7 years, compared to 42.7 years in Glen elder.
  • Hot springs village has a higher median income of $68,580, compared to $65,417 in Glen elder.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 61.0% in Hot springs village.
  • Glen elder has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Hot springs village.
  • Hot springs village has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.

Demographics

Demographics Glen elder vs Hot springs village provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glen elder Hot springs village
Black Data is updating 1
White 86 95
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 1
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Hot springs village

  • In Hot springs village, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Hot springs village at 95% compared to 86% in Glen elder.
  • The Asian population is larger in Glen elder at 2% compared to 0% in Hot springs village.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Glen elder at 7% compared to 1% in Hot springs village.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Glen elder at 5% compared to 3% in Hot springs village.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen elder and Hot springs village at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glen elder Hot springs village
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 10.6%
Depression 21.3% 25.1%
Smoking 17.7% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 16.6%
Obesity 38.5% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Hot springs village

  • In Hot springs village, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Glen elder.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hot springs village at 25.1% versus 21.3% in Glen elder.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Glen elder at 17.7% compared to 16.3% in Hot springs village.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 16.6% in Hot springs village.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Glen elder at 38.5% compared to 33.0% in Hot springs village.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Hot springs village.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glen elder Hot springs village
No Schooling 0.6% (2) 0.4% (60)
High School Diploma 30.3% (110) 17.7% (2,980)
Less than High School 1.7% (6) 5.0% (848)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.5% (60) 33.4% (5,618)

Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Hot springs village

  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Hot springs village.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 17.7% in Hot springs village.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hot springs village at 5.0%, compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
  • In Hot springs village, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 16.5% in Glen elder.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.