Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Glen elder | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $65,417 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 80.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Ho ho kus
- The population in Ho ho kus is higher at 4,216, compared to 363 in Glen elder.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 42.7 years in Glen elder.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $65,417 in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 52.0% in Ho ho kus.
- Glen elder has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Glen elder is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Glen elder vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glen elder | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 86 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Ho ho kus
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Glen elder.
- Glen elder has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Glen elder.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 7% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 5% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen elder and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glen elder | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 5.8% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Glen elder report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glen elder at 21.3% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glen elder at 17.7% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 19.5% in Glen elder.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glen elder at 38.5% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glen elder | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (110) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 1.7% (6) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (60) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ho ho kus at 2.0%, compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 16.5% in Glen elder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.