Demographics details for Glen elder, KS vs Clifton hill, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glen elder, KS vs Clifton hill, MO.
| Data | Glen elder | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 87 |
| Median Age | 42.7 years | 28.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,417 | $45,500 |
| Married Families | 80.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Glen elder vs Clifton hill
- In Glen elder, the population is higher at 363, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- Residents in Glen elder have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Glen elder has a higher median income of $65,417 compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen elder at 80.0% compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
- The poverty level is identical in both Glen elder and Clifton hill at 10%.
- Clifton hill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Glen elder.
Demographics
Demographics Glen elder vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glen elder | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 94 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glen elder vs Clifton hill
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Glen elder and Clifton hill at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton hill at 94% compared to 86% in Glen elder.
- The Asian population is larger in Glen elder at 2% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Glen elder at 7% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clifton hill at 6%, compared to 5% in Glen elder.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen elder and Clifton hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glen elder | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glen elder vs Clifton hill
- In Clifton hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in Glen elder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clifton hill at 25.9% versus 21.3% in Glen elder.
- Clifton hill has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 17.7% in Glen elder.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glen elder at 19.5% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 38.5% in Glen elder.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glen elder at 22.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glen elder | Clifton hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (110) | 26.4% (23) |
| Less than High School | 1.7% (6) | 13.8% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (60) | 3.4% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glen elder vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 26.4% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clifton hill at 13.8%, compared to 1.7% in Glen elder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glen elder hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.