Demographics details for Glasgow, MT vs Shirley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glasgow, MT vs Shirley, NY.
Data | Glasgow | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,192 | 26,498 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $65,850 | $109,821 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Glasgow vs Shirley
- The population in Shirley is higher at 26,498, compared to 3,192 in Glasgow.
- Residents in Glasgow have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 40.4 years in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821, compared to $65,850 in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glasgow at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- Glasgow has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Glasgow.
Demographics
Demographics Glasgow vs Shirley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Glasgow | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 8 |
White | 89 | 56 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 3 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glasgow vs Shirley
- In Shirley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Glasgow.
- Glasgow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- In Shirley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Glasgow.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shirley at 8%, compared to 4% in Glasgow.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glasgow at 3% compared to 0% in Shirley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Glasgow | Shirley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.7% |
Depression | 24.2% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glasgow vs Shirley
- More residents in Glasgow report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glasgow at 24.2% compared to 21.1% in Shirley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glasgow at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glasgow at 22.4% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glasgow at 36.3% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glasgow at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Glasgow | Shirley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 2.1% (555) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (581) | 22.2% (5,874) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (228) | 13.4% (3,542) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (434) | 13.4% (3,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glasgow vs Shirley
- In Shirley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Glasgow.
- In Shirley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 18.2% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shirley at 13.4%, compared to 7.1% in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glasgow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.