Demographics details for Glasgow, MT vs Riverdale, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glasgow, MT vs Riverdale, GA.
| Data | Glasgow | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,192 | 14,715 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,850 | $61,622 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Glasgow vs Riverdale
- The population in Riverdale is higher at 14,715, compared to 3,192 in Glasgow.
- Residents in Glasgow have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 37.4 years in Riverdale.
- Glasgow has a higher median income of $65,850 compared to $61,622 in Riverdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glasgow at 39.0% compared to 28.0% in Riverdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Riverdale at 20%, compared to 10% in Glasgow.
- Riverdale has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.1% in Glasgow.
Demographics
Demographics Glasgow vs Riverdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glasgow | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 86 |
| White | 89 | 1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glasgow vs Riverdale
- In Riverdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 1% in Glasgow.
- Glasgow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 1% in Riverdale.
- In Riverdale, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Glasgow and Riverdale at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Glasgow at 4% compared to 3% in Riverdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glasgow at 3% compared to 0% in Riverdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glasgow | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glasgow vs Riverdale
- In Riverdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Glasgow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glasgow at 24.2% compared to 15.9% in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 17.7% in Glasgow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glasgow at 22.4% compared to 12.5% in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 36.3% in Glasgow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glasgow at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Riverdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glasgow | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 3.1% (457) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (581) | 18.3% (2,693) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (228) | 9.7% (1,434) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (434) | 12.3% (1,805) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glasgow vs Riverdale
- In Riverdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.3% in Glasgow.
- In Riverdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 18.2% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverdale at 9.7%, compared to 7.1% in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glasgow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 12.3% in Riverdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.