Demographics details for Glasgow, MT vs Brandon, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glasgow, MT vs Brandon, FL.
Data | Glasgow | Brandon |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,192 | 114,923 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 37.2 years |
Median Income | $65,850 | $71,156 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Glasgow vs Brandon
- The population in Brandon is higher at 114,923, compared to 3,192 in Glasgow.
- Residents in Glasgow have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 37.2 years in Brandon.
- Brandon has a higher median income of $71,156, compared to $65,850 in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glasgow at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Brandon.
- The poverty level is identical in both Glasgow and Brandon at 10%.
- Brandon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Glasgow.
Demographics
Demographics Glasgow vs Brandon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Glasgow | Brandon |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 17 |
White | 89 | 35 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 3 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Glasgow vs Brandon
- In Brandon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Glasgow.
- Glasgow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 35% in Brandon.
- In Brandon, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Glasgow.
- Brandon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 3% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brandon at 14%, compared to 4% in Glasgow.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glasgow at 3% compared to 0% in Brandon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Glasgow | Brandon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.3% |
Depression | 24.2% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 29.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glasgow vs Brandon
- More residents in Glasgow report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Brandon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glasgow at 24.2% compared to 17.9% in Brandon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glasgow at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Brandon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glasgow at 22.4% compared to 16.9% in Brandon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glasgow at 36.3% compared to 29.1% in Brandon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glasgow at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Brandon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Glasgow | Brandon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 1.0% (1,181) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (581) | 16.3% (18,742) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (228) | 11.5% (13,248) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (434) | 24.2% (27,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glasgow vs Brandon
- In Brandon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glasgow hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Brandon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brandon at 11.5%, compared to 7.1% in Glasgow.
- In Brandon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 13.6% in Glasgow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.