Demographics details for Glasgow, MT vs Baldwin park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glasgow, MT vs Baldwin park, CA.
| Data | Glasgow | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,192 | 69,455 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $65,850 | $76,002 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Glasgow vs Baldwin park
- The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 3,192 in Glasgow.
- Residents in Glasgow have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $65,850 in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glasgow at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
- The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 10% in Glasgow.
- Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 3.1% in Glasgow.
Demographics
Demographics Glasgow vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glasgow | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 89 | -25 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 23 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 23 |
| American Indian | 3 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Glasgow vs Baldwin park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Glasgow and Baldwin park at 1%.
- Glasgow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Glasgow.
- Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 3% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 4% in Glasgow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glasgow and Baldwin park at 3%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glasgow | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 14.7% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glasgow vs Baldwin park
- More residents in Glasgow report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glasgow at 24.2% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glasgow at 17.7% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glasgow at 22.4% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Glasgow at 36.3% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glasgow at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glasgow | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 5.5% (3,853) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (581) | 18.1% (12,587) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (228) | 41.7% (28,939) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (434) | 9.8% (6,787) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glasgow vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.3% in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glasgow hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 7.1% in Glasgow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Glasgow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.