Demographics details for Glasgow, MT vs Aberdeen, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Glasgow, MT vs Aberdeen, SD.
| Data | Glasgow | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,192 | 28,210 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $65,850 | $62,684 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Glasgow vs Aberdeen
- The population in Aberdeen is higher at 28,210, compared to 3,192 in Glasgow.
- Residents in Glasgow have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 35.6 years in Aberdeen.
- Glasgow has a higher median income of $65,850 compared to $62,684 in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Glasgow at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Aberdeen.
- The poverty level is identical in both Glasgow and Aberdeen at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Glasgow is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.2% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Glasgow vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Glasgow | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 89 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | 3 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Glasgow vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Glasgow.
- Glasgow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 79% in Aberdeen.
- In Aberdeen, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Glasgow.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Glasgow.
- Both Glasgow and Aberdeen have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 3% in Glasgow.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Glasgow | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Glasgow vs Aberdeen
- More residents in Glasgow report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.0% in Aberdeen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Glasgow at 24.2% compared to 17.5% in Aberdeen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Glasgow at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Aberdeen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Glasgow at 22.4% compared to 20.2% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.3% in Glasgow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Glasgow at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Aberdeen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Glasgow | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 0.4% (121) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (581) | 18.2% (5,127) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (228) | 8.0% (2,266) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (434) | 22.0% (6,206) |
Education Levels Comparison: Glasgow vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Glasgow.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 18.2%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 8.0%, compared to 7.1% in Glasgow.
- In Aberdeen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 13.6% in Glasgow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.