Demographics details for Gladewater, TX vs Woods hole, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gladewater, TX vs Woods hole, MA.
Data | Gladewater | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,230 | 992 |
Median Age | 33.3 years | 65.8 years |
Median Income | $47,749 | $72,031 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gladewater vs Woods hole
- In Gladewater, the population is higher at 6,230, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
- The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 33.3 years in Gladewater.
- Woods hole has a higher median income of $72,031, compared to $47,749 in Gladewater.
- In Woods hole, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 26.0% in Gladewater.
- Gladewater has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Woods hole.
- Woods hole has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Gladewater.
Demographics
Demographics Gladewater vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gladewater | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | Data is updating |
White | 61 | 96 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gladewater vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gladewater at 17% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 61% in Gladewater.
- The Asian population is larger in Gladewater at 1% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gladewater at 15% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gladewater at 6% compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gladewater and Woods hole at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gladewater | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 7.3% |
Depression | 25.8% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 20.9% | 9.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 26.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gladewater vs Woods hole
- More residents in Gladewater report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gladewater at 25.8% compared to 21.5% in Woods hole.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gladewater at 20.9% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 17.5% in Gladewater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gladewater at 38.5% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gladewater at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Woods hole.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gladewater | Woods hole |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (1,135) | 7.4% (73) |
Less than High School | 24.6% (1,532) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (474) | 67.2% (667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gladewater vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of residents in Gladewater have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gladewater hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
- More residents in Gladewater have less than a high school education at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 7.6% in Gladewater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.