Demographics details for Gladewater, TX vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gladewater, TX vs New london, CT.
Data | Gladewater | New london |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,230 | 27,980 |
Median Age | 33.3 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $47,749 | $56,237 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Gladewater vs New london
- The population in New london is higher at 27,980, compared to 6,230 in Gladewater.
- The median age in New london is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 33.3 years in Gladewater.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237, compared to $47,749 in Gladewater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gladewater at 26.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- The poverty level is higher in New london at 12%, compared to 10% in Gladewater.
- New london has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Gladewater.
Demographics
Demographics Gladewater vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gladewater | New london |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 17 |
White | 61 | 41 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gladewater vs New london
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Gladewater and New london at 17%.
- Gladewater has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 41% in New london.
- In New london, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Gladewater.
- New london has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 15% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New london at 11%, compared to 6% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gladewater and New london at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gladewater | New london |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.5% |
Depression | 25.8% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 20.9% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gladewater vs New london
- More residents in Gladewater report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.9% in New london.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gladewater at 25.8% compared to 23.3% in New london.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gladewater at 20.9% compared to 19.5% in New london.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gladewater at 17.5% compared to 15.2% in New london.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gladewater at 38.5% compared to 37.1% in New london.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gladewater at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gladewater | New london |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (30) | 1.4% (399) |
High School Diploma | 18.2% (1,135) | 16.0% (4,487) |
Less than High School | 24.6% (1,532) | 13.7% (3,830) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (474) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gladewater vs New london
- In New london, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Gladewater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gladewater hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in Gladewater have less than a high school education at 24.6% compared to 13.7% in New london.
- In New london, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 7.6% in Gladewater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.